Audit AI visibility
We ask the assistants the questions your buyers ask, and record whether you appear, a competitor appears, or the answer is wrong.
AI Built Service
Getting cited by AI assistants, shipping builds faster, and running the repetitive work at catalogue scale — with a human reviewing every output, because that is what makes it usable.



Projects delivered
Happy clients
Years of experience
What actually changed
People increasingly ask an assistant instead of scanning ten blue links. Google answers a large share of searches with an AI Overview, and ChatGPT and Perplexity now handle a real portion of product research outright.
When that happens, ranking fourth is worth very little. What matters is whether the assistant names you in the answer. In November 2025 Adobe agreed to acquire Semrush for $1.9 billion, explicitly to combine traditional SEO with generative engine optimisation — a reasonable signal that this is a discipline rather than a buzzword.
What we build
Structuring your products, content and schema so ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews cite you in the answer — not just rank you on a page nobody clicks.
We use AI for scaffolding, design directions and first-draft content, which shortens delivery. Every output is reviewed and rewritten by the people who sign off on the work.
Search that understands intent and Thai spelling variation, plus recommendations based on what people actually buy together in your catalogue.
An assistant trained on your real products, stock and policies — answering sizing, delivery and availability on LINE, where Thai customers already ask.
Product descriptions, category copy and metadata for thousands of SKUs in Thai and English, generated to a house style then edited, not published raw.
Migration mapping, deduplication, attribute normalisation and image tagging — the unglamorous work AI is genuinely good at.
How we do it
There is no trick here and anyone selling one is guessing. What works is unglamorous and checkable.
We ask the assistants the questions your buyers ask, and record whether you appear, a competitor appears, or the answer is wrong.
Clean structured data, real product specifications, and pages that answer a question directly instead of burying it under introduction.
Content restructured so the useful part is near the top — research on AI citation consistently finds the opening of a page carries disproportionate weight.
Assistants cross-check claims. Consistent details across your site, directories and third-party mentions make you safer to cite.
Re-run the same prompts on a schedule and track where you appear. AI visibility moves, so this is monitoring rather than a one-off project.
Built for Thailand
Models handle Thai unevenly. We test output with Thai speakers rather than trusting the first result.
Assistants answer from your catalogue, stock and policies — not from whatever the model half-remembers.
When the assistant is unsure it hands over to your team instead of inventing an answer.
Customer data in AI features is handled with Thailand's PDPA in mind, not bolted on afterwards.
Where we don't use it
Plenty of agencies now put AI on everything. These are the places we deliberately don't, because the failure mode lands on your customers rather than on us.
Selected work
AI FAQ
It is the work of making your store the source an AI assistant cites when someone asks it a buying question. It matters because the behaviour has already shifted: Google shows AI Overviews on a large share of searches, and assistants like ChatGPT and Perplexity now answer a meaningful slice of research queries directly. Adobe agreed to buy Semrush for $1.9 billion in November 2025 explicitly to combine traditional SEO with generative engine optimisation — which is a fair indication the discipline is not hype.
Normal SEO competes for a click. AI search competes to be inside the answer. Much of the groundwork overlaps — clean structure, real specifications, fast pages, accurate schema — but the emphasis differs: answer the question early and plainly, and make sure the same facts about you appear consistently everywhere an assistant might check.
No, and we would be sceptical of anyone who says they do. We use AI where it genuinely helps — scaffolding, first drafts, migration mapping, repetitive data work — which shortens delivery. Architecture, design judgement, integration and quality control stay with our team, because that is where projects actually succeed or fail.
Raw, unedited output can. Google's guidance targets low-value content produced at scale, regardless of how it was made. We use generation to get to a first draft for large catalogues, then edit for accuracy, brand voice and genuine specifics. The test we apply is simple: would this page be useful if a person had written it?
Yes, but quality varies more in Thai than in English, so it needs checking rather than assuming. We ground the assistant in your real catalogue and policies, test output with Thai speakers, and set it to hand over to a human when confidence is low instead of guessing.
That is the main risk, and it is a design problem rather than an unavoidable one. We ground answers in your live product data and policies rather than the model's general knowledge, constrain what it is allowed to assert, and route anything uncertain to your team.
It depends what you need. An AI visibility audit is a small, contained piece of work. An assistant grounded in your catalogue, or content generation across thousands of SKUs, is a project in its own right. We scope it as a phase you can approve on its own rather than a vague AI line item.
We'll ask the assistants the questions your buyers ask and show you what comes back — whether that's you, a competitor, or something wrong about your products.